10 hits   9.85 per million (hits/wds×1,000,000), 6.92/mill in RefCorp for KEYNESS=1.42 in brown_strip.txt [?]

001. abrupt as in 1958 nor as severe as in late 1959 and 1960". # THESIS REFUTED# Sprinkel strongly refuted the current neo-st
002. his antifundamentalist views. The desire to substantiate a THESIS at the expense of sound research technique smacks mor
003. imary reason for the abandonment of the "shore occupied by" THESIS has been the assimilation and accumulation of archaeo
004. he "right", as represented by Barth, rests on the following THESIS: The only tenable alternative to Bultmann's position
005. ead spread out. Important as was Mr. O'Donnell's essay, his THESIS is so restricting as to deny Faulkner the stature whi
006. ED# Sprinkel strongly refuted the current neo-stagnationist THESIS that we are facing a future of limited and slow growt
007. son's Romans, Kelts and Saxons defended in part the Seebohm THESIS while at the present time H.P.R. Finberg and Gordon C
008. nce thinking done by anyone but himself. An equally tenable THESIS is that the dearth of new thought was created by the
009. ed and extended by bards of successive generations, and the THESIS is striking and compelling. Yet a fresh inspection wi
010. ies over the naturalness of death is an illustration of the THESIS that death cannot be only a punishment, for some term