115 hits   113.25 per million (hits/wds×1,000,000), 85.50/mill in RefCorp for KEYNESS=1.32 in brown_strip.txt [?]

001. lear propulsion for aircraft. One seldom hears the analogy " NUCLEAR propulsion will do for the aircraft what it has alre
002. of the shape found from electron microscopic examination. # NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE ( NMR) MEASUREMENTS# The magnetic
003. On October 19, after the Soviets had detonated at least 20 NUCLEAR devices, Ambassador Stevenson warned the UN General
004. it. The Free Democrats (12 per cent of the vote) believe a NUCLEAR war can be avoided by negotiating with the Soviet Un
005. of the U.N., basing their case on the world-wide fear of a NUCLEAR holocaust. I believe that these proposals, however m
006. ance, because Russia could easily guess we did not desire a NUCLEAR war except in the ultimate extremity. This left the
007. be defended with conventional weapons and then added that a NUCLEAR defense was out of the picture too. The crisis has b
008. cize them, as they realize they would be sitting ducks in a NUCLEAR war. We should stand firmly and courageously for our
009. d for you, might not be much worse than a bad cold. After a NUCLEAR blast, one bureaucrat suggested in those halcyon day
010. ern Europe are overwhelmingly opposed to participation in a NUCLEAR war. The fact is that the Italians, French and Briti
011. g rather than to take the risk of a communist world. Even a NUCLEAR holocaust is a little less frightful to contemplate
012. ident's making a final effort in the summit spotlight for a NUCLEAR test accord. There is no single issue that has arous
013. is strategy heightened the possibility that we would have a NUCLEAR war. It also weakened our diplomatic stance, because
014. ntry limited its ability to fight any kind of war besides a NUCLEAR war. This strategy heightened the possibility that w
015. see the justice of surrendering West Berlin to communism. A NUCLEAR pacifier of these dimensions- roughly some six and a
016. t. The Soviet Union will fight neither a conventional nor a NUCLEAR war over Berlin, and neither will its Warsaw Pact al
017. ve a "go" order. Even he does not know the one signal for a NUCLEAR strike- the "go code". In an emergency he would rece
018. ly way out of this state of affairs is agreement to abolish NUCLEAR weapons; otherwise no peace is possible. "Government
019. uld be sufficient to still the voices of those who advocate NUCLEAR warfare instead of negotiations. President Kennedy w
020. , French and British know that they have no defense against NUCLEAR bombs. We have no right to criticize them, as they r
021. eason such as economy, we are not going to develop aircraft NUCLEAR propulsion with a sense of national urgency, then we
022. ft which we have today are tied to large, "soft" airfields. NUCLEAR rockets can destroy airfields with ease. Here then i
023. whether new restraining devices should be installed on all NUCLEAR weapons. Meanwhile, the experts speak of wars trigge
024. may be forced upon us, from limited emergencies to all-out NUCLEAR general war. #FORCES AND MILITARY PERSONNEL STRENGTH
025. ecution"- the moment a "go order" would unleash an American NUCLEAR strike. There is little time for the men in the comm
026. r, was derived from the reactor of the more modern American NUCLEAR submarine Skipjack. #FIVE HELD FOR TRIAL# The announ
027. ventional wars too, Secretary of State Rusk junks bluff and NUCLEAR brinkmanship and builds more muscle and greater safe
028. s paramagnetic, and electron paramagnetic dipole as well as NUCLEAR dipole effects lead to line broadening. The lines ar
029. oday primarily for clues as to whether or not there will be NUCLEAR Armageddon in the immediate future. The evident cont
030. alation, and escalation is what we are getting. The biggest NUCLEAR device the United States has exploded measured some
031. f its people, so crucial in time of peril, would be broken. NUCLEAR weapons have given the world the means for self-dest
032. the people within them are ideally suited to destruction by NUCLEAR weapons. However, because this vulnerability is mutu
033. aircraft has resulted in our half-hearted effort to develop NUCLEAR propulsion for aircraft. One seldom hears the analog
034. a nullity. The United States and Soviet Russia have enough NUCLEAR weapons to destroy all nations. Recent statements by
035. dent cannot personally remove the safety devices from every NUCLEAR trigger. He makes the momentous decision. Hundreds o
036. roduction of a weapon caused so much apprehension and fear. NUCLEAR weapons are fearsome, but the long-range ballistic m
037. erstone" of its foreign policy, but has announced that five NUCLEAR submarines will eventually be at NATO's disposal in
038. ndeed it is possible to separate electron paramagnetic from NUCLEAR effects. The information provided by the electron pa
039. ted and disarmed Germany whose neutrality and immunity from NUCLEAR bombing would be guaranteed by the Big Four powers a
040. anywhere on earth. To meet situations of less than general NUCLEAR war, we continue to maintain our carrier forces, our
041. means available to us. It seems reasonable that if general NUCLEAR war is not to be one cataclysmic act of burning each
042. the opponent's cities, at least so long as the opponent has NUCLEAR weapons with which to effect reprisal. It should be
043. nts were at work. "Her basic hull form [a teardrop] and her NUCLEAR power plant will be used for almost all new submarin
044. fficial military establishment can only threaten to use its NUCLEAR arms; it cannot bring them into actual play. A more
045. to hear the news. "Bomb them"! he shouted. "Throw a little NUCLEAR hardware at them! Show them who's boss"! But in bed
046. lub shouting, "Bomb Cuba! Bomb Berlin! Let's throw a little NUCLEAR hardware at them and show them who's boss". He was b
047. egic Air Command is the principal element of our long-range NUCLEAR capability. One of the important and difficult decis
048. er Russian weapons, including the possibility of long-range NUCLEAR missiles, being located in Cuba. Obviously, we can't
049. es. If we stop thinking in terms of tremendous multimegaton NUCLEAR weapons and consider employing much smaller nuclear
050. minated by two large, powerful nations armed with murderous NUCLEAR weapons that make conventional warfare of the past a
051. Nations of the West and of the East keep busy making newer NUCLEAR weapons to defend themselves in the event the consta
052. wn scientists regarding the destructive power of the newest NUCLEAR bombs and the deadly fall-outs should be sufficient
053. will not wage war for West Berlin, neither conventional nor NUCLEAR, and negotiations will come as certainly as the peac
054. as ever. The second great dilemma has been the morality of NUCLEAR testing, a dilemma which has suddenly become acute b
055. all nuclear weapons. Few people realize that one kiloton of NUCLEAR explosive power will create 1,000 psi overpressure a
056. am referring to this country conducting atmosphere tests of NUCLEAR bombs just because Russia is. Will our bombs be clea
057. at reasonable cost to the comsumer. With the development of NUCLEAR technology, isotopic materials, and machine radiatio
058. business? We have so many new things to fear in this age of NUCLEAR weapons, dreadful things which are too horrible to c
059. ca had none before. This year, moreover, growing numbers of NUCLEAR powered submarines will enter our active forces, som
060. d guardians to demonstrate against the ghastly stupidity of NUCLEAR weapons and jolt the people out of their complacency
061. ent of mankind or its provisional justice runs some risk of NUCLEAR warfare and the danger that an effect of it will, by
062. er Khrushchev was also concerned about a possible spread of NUCLEAR weapons, particularly to Communist China. The questi
063. et of moral dilemmas. The first dilemma was the morality of NUCLEAR warfare itself. That dilemma is as much with us as e
064. ether our lead over the Russians in quality and quantity of NUCLEAR weapons is so slight as to make the tests absolutely
065. even continued stalemate, would mean an unchecked spread of NUCLEAR weapons to other countries as well as a fatal blow t
066. g that the choice lies between capitulation and the risk of NUCLEAR war, I think he is right. I do not accept that the c
067. hat the choice is between capitulation and the certainty of NUCLEAR war". Even Professor Arnold Toynbee, agreeing with h
068. is better than a policy which allows for the possibility of NUCLEAR war". If we have not thought and made a decision ent
069. is better than a policy which allows for the possibility of NUCLEAR war". "If asked to choose between a terrible probabi
070. nder these circumstances, cannot be one massive exchange of NUCLEAR devastation. Forces will survive a surprise attack,
071. ns. Only the President is permitted to authorize the use of NUCLEAR weapons. That's the law. But what if somebody decide
072. olic responses to reduced oxygen tension; neuropathology of NUCLEAR and cosmic radiation; carcinoma of prostate; evaluat
073. permit" in the sense explained. By contrast, a good deal of NUCLEAR pacifism begins with the contingencies and the proba
074. t helping them face the moral crisis involved in the use of NUCLEAR energy. It is not making them sensitive to the sub-C
075. ve pin pricking from administration statements. Policies on NUCLEAR test ban negotiations were reviewed and changed. But
076. erned by the surge of animosity he has aroused, yet our own NUCLEAR statesmen seem intent on following compulsively in h
077. viet tests, we are now clearly compelled to conduct our own NUCLEAR tests". Taking account of the fact that such a move
078. and experimentally verify this influence since quantitative NUCLEAR resonance is becoming increasingly used in investiga
079. tension: specifically to crush the Cuban revolution, resume NUCLEAR testing, resist more vigorously admission of China t
080. the other members of the atomic club. Until Moscow resumed NUCLEAR testing last September 1, the US and UK had released
081. any small nuclear weapons. An aircraft with a load of small NUCLEAR weapons could very conceivably be given a mission to
082. ate spans of bridges, etc. With these keen "eyes" and small NUCLEAR weapons delivered with accuracy, military forces can
083. ch as the B-52 or B-70, could carry perhaps 50 or 100 small NUCLEAR weapons. Few people realize that one kiloton of nucl
084. d seem that the B-52 or B-70 could carry a great many small NUCLEAR weapons. An aircraft with a load of small nuclear we
085. megaton nuclear weapons and consider employing much smaller NUCLEAR weapons which may be more appropriate for most impor
086. lication, of the entire United States navy's still-building NUCLEAR sub fleet, were stolen by a London-based soviet spy
087. the past. "It is no good recommending surrender rather than NUCLEAR warfare with the proviso that surrender could be fol
088. and is sound. The danger lay in the American delusion that NUCLEAR deterrence was enough. By limiting American strength
089. s, of course, we have unwittingly become so brutalized that NUCLEAR superiority is now taken as a moral demand. Besides
090. aggressions with considerable impunity. By maintaining the NUCLEAR deterrent, but gearing American military forces to f
091. age of the Landrum-Griffin Act. #ESCALATION UNTO DEATH# The NUCLEAR war is already being fought, except that the bombs a
092. b itself, and civilization in her classic robe watching the NUCLEAR arms race, her hair standing straight out. But there
093. ening conventional forces as well as the maintenance of the NUCLEAR deterrent. This increase in the "threshold", as the
094. es of similar social and economic position to replenish the NUCLEAR core of the congregation. (Co-optation means to choo
095. events of last month should be paired); at the peaks of the NUCLEAR test and the Berlin cycles; in relation to Laos, Alg
096. ffects provide some information on the particle shapes. The NUCLEAR dipole effects provide some information on the motio
097. ibuted throughout the fiber (Figs. 2-5). In contrast to the NUCLEAR changes described above, another change in muscle nu
098. ive the initial attack enough to be able to fight back, the NUCLEAR weapons we now have- at least the bombs- can inflict
099. n, the Communists seek to undermine Western power where the NUCLEAR might of the West is irrelevant- in backwoods guerri
100. resident was especially concerned about the deadlock in the NUCLEAR test ban negotiations at Geneva. The deadlock has be
101. ron paramagnetic effects is then discussed, and finally the NUCLEAR effects are interpreted in terms of various motional
102. tron paramagnetic effects (slope) can be separated from the NUCLEAR effects (intercept). The paramagnetic dipole effects
103. ually left vague. Now, of course, that the Russians are the NUCLEAR villains, radiation is a nastier word than it was in
104. who is author of a study on The Economics of Defense in the NUCLEAR Age. One of the President's special assistants, the
105. e deterrent power of our Armed Forces comes from both their NUCLEAR retaliatory capability and their capability to condu
106. it might well be advantageous for the German people in this NUCLEAR age. It could provide security without cost of armam
107. QUIRER:_ To our everlasting shame, we led the world in this NUCLEAR arms race sixteen years ago when we dropped the firs
108. o defend themselves in the event the constantly threatening NUCLEAR war should break out. "They cannot do otherwise than
109. remember this- it isn't the aircraft which is vulnerable to NUCLEAR rockets, it is the airfield. Eliminate the vulnerabi
110. rence was enough. By limiting American strength too much to NUCLEAR strength, this country limited its ability to fight
111. thing would be better than a policy which led inevitably to NUCLEAR war, he [Toynbee] says that anything is better than
112. veloped techniques for recognizing and locating underground NUCLEAR tests through the waves in the ground which they gen
113. rse our strategic aircraft by a factor of 10 or more. @ Use NUCLEAR propulsions to keep our long-range military aircraft
114. ould have if he were to strike with complete surprise using NUCLEAR rockets. It is relatively easy to go a step further
115. f extreme accuracy which forces the use of very large yield NUCLEAR weapons. Today we have side-looking radar which has